> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 01:26:43 -0400
>
> In a message dated 01-04-02 21:59:25 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon & Stacy
> Boone) writes:
> > haha. "Big" treat clarified as BIG A*S Geckonia, not any real written
> > treats.
>
> Wow! I disagree---that was quite the written treat! What a fascinating and
> informative post!
Hear, hear! First-hand natural history info like this is as rare as
it is valuable in gecko land!
###########################################################################
THE GLOBAL GECKO ASSOCIATION LISTSERV
WebSite: www.gekkota.com Archive: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
The GGA takes no responsibility for the contents of these postings.
###########################################################################
- RE: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Beverly Erlebacher
- Re: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Racodactylus
- Re: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Racodactylus
- RE: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Jon & Stacy Boone
- RE: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Neil A. Meister
- RE: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Jon & Stacy Boone
- Re: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia JStacyY
- Re: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Julie Bergman
- Re: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Peter Mudde
- Re: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Beverly Erlebacher
- Re: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia JStacyY
- Re: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Julie Bergman
- RE: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Beverly Erlebacher
- RE: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Jon & Stacy Boone
- RE: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Jon & Stacy Boone
- Re: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia JStacyY
- RE: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Jon & Stacy Boone
- Re: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Racodactylus
- Re: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Racodactylus
- Re: [Gecko] Stenodactylus, and Geckonia Racodactylus
