Hi,

i was interested in the "other" Eublepharis species
for a little while so i did some research at the
university library.

i saw some decent pics in papers, mostly preserved
specimens though.  all of my papers are in florida
though, so sorry i can't give you references!  i'm
sure Tony Gamble's Bibliography to Eublepharis lists
them all.

i could not identify an "E. turkmenicus" or "E.
afghanicus" on sight without any key, but the
"afghanicus" looks surprisingly like a tangerine
macularius, and the "agramainyu" like a patternless!

i didn't know an "E. afghanicus" even existed!  Those
people with the "Afghan geckos homepage" probably they
got confused with "Eublepharis macularius afghanicus
B�RNER 1976"!  ;-)   (EMBL database)

also the ranges are all wrong, only E. macularius
exists in afghanistan, the others are restricted in
syria iraq iran turkmenistan pakistan india and
bangladesh.

i think Michael Kn�thig's page is excellent and is a
real service to geckophiles.  i really like the
distribution maps, and all the info about coleonyx. 
it has a pic of angramainyu vs. macularius toes.
http://www.knoethig.de/reptiles/index.htm


I would love to know how large the populations of the
other populations of Eublepharis sp. are, and why
haven't they been imported!?!

Cheers,
Andy Dilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--- John Heiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Hilde,
> 
> I just looked at that site and I would have to say
> it is bogus.  It is my understanding
> that E. macularis and E. angramainyu are nearly
> identical and are differentiated by the
> scales on the bottom of their feet/toes.  The site
> has what appears to be a juvie (6 to 9
> month old) leucistic/patternless shown as E.
> angramainyu.
> 
> But thanks for the tip, if nothing else it made me
> smile and remember how reliable the
> internet really is!
> 
> Regard,
> John
> 
> Hilde wrote:
> 
> > There is one site that I know of:
> > http://afghangeckos.netfirms.com
> >
> > However I've heard rumours that it might be leat
> partially, if not all fake. I've
> > heard everything from it being an accurate site,
> to it being nothing more than a
> > collection of pirated photos labelled with species
> names. Since I'm not familiar with
> > the other species, I can't vouch for it. You'd 
> have to get some leopard experts to
> > check it out and tell you if the species and
> pictures are of the actual species or
> > not. If they are correctly identified, then you've
> got the pictures.
> 
>
###########################################################################
>                  THE GLOBAL GECKO ASSOCIATION
> LISTSERV
>  WebSite: www.gekkota.com  Archive:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
>     The GGA takes no responsibility for the contents
> of these postings. 
>
###########################################################################
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com

Reply via email to