Re: [gecode-users] LinExp issue with MSVC 9

[Guido Tack]

Filip Konvička wrote:

It seems that spec() has more arguments in LinBin than in Actor, so the compiler chokes. (Note that the function is not explicitly "virtual" in

LinBin.) This is a "Level 4" warning 4263, which I used to have turned

not. The warning says that LinBin::spec() effectively hides

compiler probably doubts that).

into error using, so I wonder whether this should be fixed in Gecode or Actor::spec() in LinBin (which might be intentional, of course, but the

Cheers,
        Guido

C4263 is one of the warnings that is off by default, that's why we hadn't noticed yet. I'm not sure what we're going to do about it, the code is perfectly legal C++, and it doesn't cause any problems. I wouldn't want to rename the function just because of this warning. Does it help to make LinBin::spec virtual itself? If so, that would be an option.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Gecode users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.gecode.org/mailman/listinfo/gecode-users