If you are interested in Python, you might want to check out Numberjack:
http://4c110.ucc.ie/numberjack/home
We are in the process of providing an interface to Numberjack (trying to,
that is).
Christian
--
Christian Schulte, www.ict.kth.se/~cschulte/
-----Original Message-----
From: users-boun...@gecode.org [mailto:users-boun...@gecode.org] On Behalf
Of Denys Duchier
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 6:22 PM
To: us...@gecode.org
Subject: Re: [gecode-users] new IntArgs fails
"Christian Schulte" <cschu...@kth.se> writes:
> Argument arrays are really meant to just pass arguments, they are bad as
> general data structures. Why not use vector instead?
I was playing with generating gecode bindings for python (to better
understand the issue, the options, and where the problems are) and
e.g. the constructor IntSet(IntArgs&) requires IntArgs; vector<int> is
not an option. The generated wrapper for IntArgs does a new and that
didn't compile; I was simply curious if that was intended.
I, of course, don't particularly want IntArgs in python. That was just
a quick try to see how some things worked out (or not).
Cheers,
--Denys
_______________________________________________
Gecode users mailing list
us...@gecode.org
https://www.gecode.org/mailman/listinfo/gecode-users
_______________________________________________
Gecode users mailing list
us...@gecode.org
https://www.gecode.org/mailman/listinfo/gecode-users
