On Wednesday 13 December 2006 19:06, Stephen Williams wrote: > The down side is git takes up non-trivial amounts of disk space.
FWIW, the entire history of gaf in a git pack is 16 MB. But, yes, I'm sure it would be much larger unpacked. Then again, disk space is now well below one £/GB, so it's not like it's that much of a downside unless it's the Linux kernel that you're handling a git history of. :) > The other down side is that it is still "new" compared to CVS, > and as my fingers are aware, there is bound to be much inertia > between you and git nirvana. That's true. However, the (very) rapid adoption of git by many other major projects is a testament to it's performance! Cheers, Peter -- Fisher Society committee http://tinyurl.com/o39w2 CUSBC novices, match and league secretary http://tinyurl.com/mwrc9 CU Spaceflight http://tinyurl.com/ognu2 v3sw6YChw7$ln3pr6$ck3ma8u7+Lw3+2m0l7Ci6e4+8t4Gb8en6g6Pa2Xs5Mr4p4 hackerkey.com peter-b.co.uk
pgpyqmckBa1UI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
