Timmerman, Bert wrote:
Hi,
Let me see if understand this correct:
If a user wishes to pay an "acceleration fee" (read donation) for adding
improvements to a GPL'ed tool he/she would pay for the acceleration, and
not pay for the GPL'ed tool that is the result of this acceleration.
IMO, that would still be better than paying for a "license to use"
(instead of an owner's license) in the micro$oft world.
Even better, IMHO: produce a native Windows build (*not* Cygwin), wrap
it up in a fancy installer, and sell it to Windows users, for maybe $100
- $200. I bet this would make far more money than gedaconsulting.
Steve's pretty much there already, but I suspect that the gschem/pcb
developers would be unimpressed by this.
Evan
_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
