Hi Patrick (and all),
[snip]
>You understand it will mean, at some point in the future, removing
>half of the contents of the branch you are going to merge? And I am
>not speaking of the time that will be lost on fixing the 'release
>critical issues'.
Okay. Fair enough. I have now merged (via PeterB's patch sets)
only the glist changes from Carlos' branch. Please test and comment.
PeterB, I like the glist patch sets. How did you create them
again? What's the secret git magic here? :)
> > [...]
> > Only after all the above branches are in back on HEAD will I consider
> > the next set of major refactoring patches. Anybody object?
>
>I will not be the one to adapt the 'moving and rotating' stuff with
>existing code in gschem for the copy/move/place actions without first
>refactoring the functions there and their companion changes to libgeda.
>
Okay, but before we go off with more refactoring let's get the
new CVS HEAD stabilized and figure out a plan for the next set of major
changes. And let's coordinate so that nobody is surprised when we
start refactoring or changing lots of code.
Thanks to all for their patience and restraint during the past
few weeks. Now I just need to clean up the 900 gEDA related messages
in my mailbox. :(
-Ales
_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
