On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 12:01 -0600, Marc Moreau wrote: > I think those fall under 'not-code'. SoC rules say that the project must be > code. THey explicitly preclude documentation. I think symbol verification > and fixing falls closer to documentaion then it does to code. > > We could give it a try, but I don't think it is viable. > > -Marc
Fair enough.. I've not fully read all their terms and conditions. I did wounder if those would be excluded. It would be good to see work done on code for a parts managers though, which might require some tidying up as part of assembling + testing the database for our existing parts. Peter C. _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
