> > On Jun 11, 2007, at 8:10 AM, John Griessen wrote: > > > As far as including scheme code to execute and worry > > > about "danger" of doing that -- > > > go right ahead. Just live with the danger, ...... > > > On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 08:29 -0600, John Doty wrote: > > The problem isn't "irresponsible users". It's *malicious* > > publishers of symbols. When data has hooks to allow > > arbitrary code execution, you're giving virus/trojan > > creators a free ride. We want to promote free exchange of > > symbols, no? The possibility of an infected symbol would be > > a real impediment here. > On Monday 11 June 2007, Peter Clifton wrote: > Assuming its even a good idea, we could:
That's the one I was questioning. What functionality does it add? A schematic is a bunch of objects with connections. Any action belongs to some other tool. Can you give an example of a case where the ability to embed code in a symbol is of real value? _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
