On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 10:59:05PM -0400, Ales Hvezda wrote: > Hi Hamish, > > [snip] > >OK. I only just got libgeda 20070526 into Debian (the soname change > >caused a long processing delay), but I'll hold off if you wish. > > > >I'm still unsure about what version number to give the package. > >Logically it has to be either 20070626, 20070626-1.0.1, or 1:1.0.1 (with > >or without the date). Perhaps I'll stick with the dates for now. > > What about 1:1.0.1.20070626? Does that work for Debian? Would > just 1:1.0.1 be easier? I'm willing to drop the date part from the > tarballs, but I will output the full date to the user if they ask.
OK, I can use 1:1.0.1.20070626. That means that all future releases will need to be include a version number, else we will later need 2:1.1.0.. Do you plan to keep a version number component for all releases? Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
