[snip]
>> I'm sure it's an oversight by whoever used it, so no hard feelings. I
>> suppose most developers use much more up-to-date boxen than I do.
>> Catching stuff like this is one reason I use old boxen. So, whoever
>> used it, I'd be very happy if you would find an equivalent gtk-2.4
>> compliant way to accomplish your goal. :-)
>
>That would be me. Sorry -- and yes, it was an oversight. We definitely ne=
>ed=20
>a way to audit which library functions are in use!
>
>I'm afraid I can't fix it right now, but I'll try and get a fix out this=20
>evening (UK time).
>
I've fixed this on master. Please verify my fix.
http://git.gpleda.org/?p=gaf.git;a=commit;h=e4e105b3309dcbc0b598318e1b24591dec39422a
-Ales
-Ales
_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
