Three more votes and you would have had enough to win the 2000 presidential elction which George won fair and square by a vote of 5 to 4.
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 10:14 -0500, Stuart Brorson wrote: > Three reasons: > > 1. Some people who work only on gerbv felt that geda-dev has too much > traffic to follow. > > 2. People only interested in gerbv (and totally unaware of gEDA/gaf, > PCB, etc) can easily find the mailing list from the SF site. > > 3. Popular demand. That is, there were two requests for it! > > Stuart > > > On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Peter TB Brett wrote: > > > On Friday 07 December 2007 14:30:45 Stuart Brorson wrote: > > > >> As we continue to revivify gerbv -- the gEDA Project's Gerber viewer > >> -- I have created a new mailing list for discussions relevant to the > >> *development* of gerbv. This mailing list is called gerbv-devel. > > > > Is there any particular reason why geda-dev was insufficient? > > > > (curious) > > > > Peter > > > > > > -- > > Peter Brett > > > > Electronic Systems Engineer > > Integral Informatics Ltd > > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
