On Tuesday 01 January 2008 21:42:05 Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:04:55PM +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > > This should "just work" if it is called libgeda31. I just checked > > packages.debianorg. The 1.2.0 released gEDA packages depend on libgeda31 > > (>= 1:1.2.0) which will be satisfied by this newer version of libgeda31. > > If installing this new libgeda31 broke any of the 1.2.0 versions of the > > apps, then yes, we would have a problem. In this case, I don't think we > > do. geda-gschem-1.2.1 will just need to depend on libgeda31 (>= 1:1.2.1) > > Your reasoning is correct. However, installing new libgeda31 (1.2.1) > does break the installed 1.2.0 applications. gschem segfaults on > startup for me.
I can't reproduce this: I've tried several times. Could you please give me
some steps which someone who's not running Debian could reproduce?
> Now I'm a little stuck. I have started work on the libgeda31.1 rename
> but not finished all of it yet. I have not yet tried Peter Brett's patch.
> Ales says that this version is not expected to be compatible with 1.2.0
> anyway (despite the major version number indicating otherwise to the
> dynamic linker). I would appreciate some guidance on this issue :-)
I disagree with Ales, for what it's worth (i.e. very little).
Peter
--
Peter Brett
Electronic Systems Engineer
Integral Informatics Ltd
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
