On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Peter TB Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:53:53 +0200, "Bernd Jendrissek" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Until there is a decent signal notification scheme for OBJECTS to >> communicate with their collaborators, I would prefer to have the >> toplevel->page_current->CHANGED = 1; bits as local to the mutations as >> possible. This reduces the possibility of forgetting to mark the page >> as CHANGED when calling the mutator. >> >> Otherwise I like having more list-independent *_single style functions. > > Seems reasonable. Since I've already committed this, any chance of a patch > to make it work the way you prefer?
Hmm, I just re-incorporated the CHANGED = 1 parts into the fudged cherry-picks (I had to fudge them anyway) by "rejecting" the relevant one-line deletes (which are part of a bigger hunk) in Patrick's patch(es). _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
