On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 22:56 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote: > On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 17:33 +0200, Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
> I've got your code pulled into a stgit branch at the moment, so it is no > bother for me to do this as I push it. There are lots of good changes in > this series, so I'll get on with that now. > > I'll produce explicit patches where there remain differences between the > committed code and your patch series, such that it ought to be easy to > apply those and re-base your stuff without any conflicts. > > I hope you won't object to me leaving the TOPLEVEL argument, and the > doxygen comments about factories for such a delta. These would naturally > make sense to be added in the context of your complete factory code. I've pushed some of the branch. There are a few patches I'm not sure about at the end, and a delta patch between the OBJECT allocation patch (which I edited before committing) and your original code. This is all available on my repo.or.cz fork under the branch called "bernd_patches". There are a couple of white-space alterations which aren't in the delta patch, I hope this doesn't cause to much pain if you wanted to rebase against it. I hope this has made a start in diminishing the differences between the code-bases. Thanks for the patches! PS.. for those (anyone?) testing gschem with my cairo patches, that has been rebased against the new gpleda.org master branch, and is available on repo.or.cz. Best wishes, -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
