Redirecting to geda-dev, I've been discussing code on geda-user for too long already!
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 01:36 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote: > This may break slightly with my experimental code to allow polygons to > clear away other polygons. That is the only kind of object I could > imagine clearing a useful hole in a Polygon, where I'd not want to have > via-rats showing up in the hole. All other types of objects which cut > holes in polygons would get in the way of that via-rat's connectivity > anyway, so it doesn't matter if I ignore that hole. One (expensive) way around this, would be to pass the testing function the object we're trying to connect to as a parameter. We could then make a copy of the polygon being tested, do a restore-to-polygon operation for the object we're trying to connect, then test for the point. Like I said, expensive. -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
