El mié, 22-10-2008 a las 20:43 -0400, Ales Hvezda escribió: > [snip] > >I'd very much prefer that we keep all the tools in the gEDA suite licensable > >under the GPLv2+, until it's decided to move them *as a whole* to GPLv3+. > > I still haven't seen definitive written statement from anybody > of _how_ you do that (move from GPLv2 and later to GPLv3) if a project > has hundreds of copyright holders. If somebody has a link, then please > share. I'm not convinced that anybody can just declare a wholesale move > to GPLv3 even with the "and later" clause. That's why I would love to > see something definitive from the FSF (maybe it's in the FAQ already and > I've overlooked it). > > [snip] > >Ales' input is very much required here. > > It would be nice if we didn't have any GPLv3 projects inside of > gEDA/gaf for now (for all the reasons mentioned). If this is a problem, > please let us know why and maybe we can come to some sort of compromise.
Ok, I set the gxyrs license to GPLv2+ and pushed it to git. Hope this is ok. Regards, Carlos _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
