On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 19:20 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > I also ran into this today, bom'ing the powermeter board: > > http://archives.seul.org/geda/user/Feb-2008/msg00277.html > > Should we make that workaround permanent?
The fact we need it suggests that the backend isn't using tail recursion somewhere, or is being very inefficient. Peter B mentioned something about fixing that, and making the workaround unnecessary. (Peter B has scheme-fu, whereas I sadly do not). Does the workaround have any drawbacks (other than hiding the bug and killing the motivation to fix it?) -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list geda-dev@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
