Hi Peter and all, First of all: best wishes and happy coding for 2009 ;-)
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 13:38 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 10:40 +0100, Bert Timmerman wrote: > > > > > It looks like most, if not all, overbar lines are now removed (with > > > > 99.99 % certainty, Gauss and most mathematicians would be satisfied). > > Thank you for doing all that hard work Bert! > > This effort not only improves the quality of the symbols we have, but > means that rendering their text with pango (and suitable extra code to > paint the over-bars), will not break their layout. > IMO, two issues (read: challenges) still remain: 1) I noticed that some symbols (just a handful) use text entities for pin labels instead of "pinlabel=" attributes. I did not keep tags on them, as I was focused on fixing over-bar lines ;) What could/should be done about this ? Track them down and file a bug report on SF ?? 2) Werner noticed ,and he did made a list :), that there happen to be symbols living in www.gedasymbols.org that are still using over-bar lines. What could/should be done about this ? Track them down and file a bug report on SF ?? This is more of a (gEDA) user responsibility (IMHO, content always is) If my gitified CVS repo of www.gedasymbols.org reads correctly, Werner already reworked his symbols ;-) BTW: I'm thinking of pushing this gitified repo on github.com as to get more exposure for gEDA, but have not decided yet. I want to get some opinions first whether this is favorable/allowed, as github.com shares indexes with google, so maybe (gEDA) users could google for symbols. Another advantage is that anyone can fork/clone and modify to their own liking, and share the results with other co-forkers by a pull request (github.com messaging system). Kind regards, Bert Timmerman. <snip> _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list geda-dev@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
