Paul, In my non-stock version I have additional flexibility not reduced flexibility. Again, others can continue to use the stock version.
One of the reasons for open source is to allow users to modify code for their needs and desires. This is the free as in speech not free as in beer. Steve Meier On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 00:22 -0500, Paul Tan wrote: > Hi Steve, > > I am all for changes that do not impose > contraint and do make things more flexible. > I do raise concern if changes are imposed to > constrain gEDA flexible architecture unnecessarily. > > Best Regards, > Paul Tan > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Meier <sme...@alchemyresearch.com> > To: gEDA developer mailing list <geda-dev@moria.seul.org> > Sent: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 8:58 pm > Subject: Re: gEDA-dev: Google Summer of Code 2009 > > > > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 22:19 -0500, Paul Tan wrote: > > > > > Is it necessary that Gschem and/or Gnetlist > > C/SCM has to changed to accomodates your way > > of implementation? > > > > Best Regards, > > Paul Tan > > > > No it isn't necessary Gschem and/or Gnetlist C/SCM change. That is why I > have my own non-stock version. GEDA et al can continue on anyway it > likes as long as the file format is well documented. I do appreciate > Paul's work where gschem allows the setting of pin types. > > Steve Meier > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-dev mailing list > geda-dev@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-dev mailing list > geda-dev@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list geda-dev@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
