On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 02:09:02PM -0400, Stuart Brorson wrote: > > > 2. PCB's docs need TeX/LaTeX to convert the .texi docs to .pdf and > > > .dvi. RH9 doesn't install TeX/LaTeX as part of a vanilla install. > > > Again, don't ask me why; I'm just (writing) the installer. > > > > > > I have fixed this problem by putting checks into PCB's configure.in > > > and Makefile.am which look for a tex installation, and then just don't > > > build the docs from .texi files if tex is missing. I've tested this > > > stuff on my RH9 box and it seems to work. Please find these patches > > > below. Feel free to test them and include them into PCB. > > > > Why is that happening at all? I'm able to build the PCB snapshots > > without latex. By that I mean, 'make distcheck' produces a tarball > > which includes pre-built documentation so that you don't need latex > > when you're building using snapshot sources. > > Umm, it tries to re-make the .dvi and .pdf stuff from the .texi source > on my system when I do "configure && make". Here are two possible > explanations: > > 1. I do a "make clean" before "make", and that wiped out the .dvi > and .pdf files. I can check to see what targets are called out for > "make clean", and eliminate any removal of .dvi and .pdf if desired. > Probably they should only be killed by "make distclean". I will check > this.
thats it. 'make clean' kills it. I'll inquire on the auto* lists about this. I'll bet I'm not the only one who wants to distribute the sources for the docs as well as the prebuilt docs to avoid imposing a latex installation on everyone. > Personally, I think it best -- in terms of build safety -- if > ./configure simply checks for TeX/LaTeX and doesn't build anything if > TeX/LaTeX are missing. I guess I'd like to see if there is a way to not delete whats already part of the distfile. I'll see what I can figure out. > Did you try out the patches? not yet. -Dan --
