On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:48:01PM -0500, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:05:30 -0800, David Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Good idea, I like it. But are there ways to just use cvs/svn instead, > > rather than re-inventing the wheel? > > CVS provides a locked checkout model, but recently, the trend for > version control systems is to not provide locking, and instead provide > better merge services when conflicts arise.
Perhaps merging would be appropriate here? > Also, Stuart's idea has merit for use in the working directory, where > you might not want to be constantly committing files just to switch > between tools. Absolutely. CVS/svn/arch alone is not the answer. However, a lock file to synchronize between the programs, but version control for locking/synching between users? -- Joshua D. Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jdboyd.net/ http://www.joshuaboyd.org/
