On 2/9/2012 9:29 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote: > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:56:09 -0500, Dan McMahill <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 2/8/2012 5:26 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote: >> >>> Thanks for persevering. I'm very encouraged by how few defects its found >>> in >>> the main gEDA/gaf tools -- gives me a warm fuzzy feeling :-P >> >> I was fairly encouraged by how good the core tools look. There is >> certainly a lot of junk in the various utility programs though. >> >> Let me know if we hit a point where I should get another build analyzed. >> They don't have automatic submissions going yet on the new system but >> hopefully they will soon. > > Hi Dan, > > I've committed a bunch of Coverity-inspired patches to the 'stable-1.8' and > 'master' branches of my github repo. Could you please submit a new build > of 'master'? (I sent details of my repo in my previous dev list e-mail). >
There should be a new set of results up. I had to edit libgeda/include/prototype_priv.h because there was a "const const" on line 152 which probably should have been "const". -Dan -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~geda-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~geda-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
