Edward Hennessy <[email protected]> writes: > Peter, > > Can a scheme expert also target the following bug for next milestone, 1.9.1? > > http://git.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/commit/?id=7dafcd5e30e957dc1fffbb2eedae5d1a555a6552 > >
This isn't a "Quick Scheme Hack" problem; it'll likely require adding
new datastructures to libgeda, new Scheme API functions, and reworking
the whole way that copy/paste buffers in gschem work.
So, no, it'll probably not fit into 1.9.1, which I would like to release
fairly soon-ish. Probably by the end of October.
Peter
P.S. Ed, do you have a "things I am working on" list somewhere? It
seems like we may be working at cross-purposes on some things, so having
some idea of what you have planned would be useful for coordination.
Mine is here: https://github.com/peter-b/geda-gaf/wiki/To-Do
--
Dr Peter Brett <[email protected]>
pgpUNfH_pFxQJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~geda-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~geda-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
