> Interpreting a license is always a problem. It's a problem for > programmers since they are not lawyers to understand all the legal > parts to infinite
Right, but consider that the courts tend to side with the author's intentions when they choose a license, assuming the intentions don't directly conflict. Hence, we - as symbol/footprint authors - publically state our intentions as to how we interpret the licenses, so that if there's doubt, there's a record of our intentions. > P.S. DJ, I tried to send you a mail in private about the challenge > boards but your mail server seems to drop my mail considering it a > spam. I use the same email address and host as for this mail. Try again. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
