On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 04:06:34PM -0800, Harry Eaton wrote: > > which doesn't work for > > me even with "snap to pad". > > That's pretty hard to believe. The connectivity is > checked by a rigurous intersection test, no particular > points are required, any touching will do.
Ok, I saw contrary documentation, so I was assuming I was hitting a bug where nets had to end exactly on a pad. > Originally it took a fair amount of compute resources > to trace the connectivity - it still can with very > large boards so updating the whole rats nest > automatically was never really considered. You only need to update the ones for the net that's being routed... > This sounds like a bug. Send me a test case and I will > solve it. Do the source and target turn green when you > start the trace? No... > Come to think of it this coupled with your rats nest > failure above strongly suggests your layers aren't > assigned the way you think they are. I think that's it. I just built from CVS and I notice that I can repro my problem if I route on the wrong side. If I route on on the other side, things are much more sane. -- Ben Jackson AD7GD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ben.com/ _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
