On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:45:00 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > maintaining such > a database is a never-ending, time-consuming task, and that is why gEDA > officially tends to favour "light" symbols and footprints.
This is a valid reason for not providing a lib of heavy symbols in the default install. But it does not cover why there should be no infrastructure to build such a lib locally. Why not allow for a list of footprint attributes which can be chosen from via the attribute dialog? ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak http://lilalaser.de/blog _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
