DJ Delorie wrote:
They seem to go where I want them.
[jg]Great. I'll be trying some PCB carbide bits soon. The deviation of the bit itself is
far less than the alignment accuracy of the two halves of the board. Off by 10 mil or so - this is my first try at double sided, I need to try a few techniques and see which is most accurate. I'm thinking of switching from toner transfer to photomask. Then, I can drill the board first and use the holes to line up the print.
I've thought about that some, and also got a chance to do some film tests recently that were not acceptable -- it seems no easy photography supplier films are high enough contrast to get a good film for exposing photomask -- just dark grey instead of opaque black. Or black and grey if you expose it differently... So the supplies for making a pos from a neg or a reduction in size from a 2:1 print are hard to get. Agfa quit serving the US it seems -- I found one source that supplies super fine line chip/interconnect making film and didn't even bother to go through the hoops to get the price since they were dodging around the question so much. So, if you use toner on clear film and maybe stack two of them to get opacity, what's your source of photoimagable mask emulsions? I'd want some that are good with a red light instead of any total darkness processes. If you do photoimagable etch resist, you're all ready to go for soldermask also... and for masks to put on conductive inks too maybe... Conductive inks are now used in some lowest-cost-planet-wide circuit boards made in China so they have only one side etched, and the jumper layer is mostly ink on the same side, reducing holes to the minimum. You sometimes have to make conductive ink wide or use a copper wire jumper on the other side to get your desired conductance for a path, but leaving out drilling holes is best by me... John Griessen _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
