Peter Clifton wrote: > Has anyone seen this site? > > We get bad press! > http://freelabs.com/~whitis/opensymbol/#id2509420 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Due to poorly conceived standards, limitations of the gschem package > itself, and GPL fanaticism, these symbols are not usable. > > * GPL license prevents most commercial uses [jg] LGPL is the license, right?
> * Gschem schematic symbols are based on a preposterous 0.3" pin > spacing. Oh, I wouldn't call it preposterous, but, yeah, I like smaller text and spacings as a default... thus my jgboxsym script tweaked from djboxsym. > * gschem doesn't support pinswapping information, Wart. > * gschem does not support demorgan equivalents. [jg]Does he want negation bubble to mean a slice of an inverter package of 6? There are so many possibilities here... > > * gschem makes the user act as janitor Well, maybe some of that could be encapsulated in symbols... I think it's the light heavy debate though... > * Does not handle power pins properly. [jg]Power pins seem a style point -------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's a gEDA wart list again! John Griessen _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
