It is interesting to me how this discussion centres around programming languages rather than exploring and extolling the benefits of gEDA. I'm relatively new to using gEDA and this is the first time I've heard of KiCad - what I'm most interested in is which is a better tool to achieve what I want to (which is producing great electronic products as easily as possible). I would like to hear about why the structure of gEDA allows me great flexibility to increase my productivity. For an end user the underlying programming language is of little relevance, but the way I interact with the set of tools is.
When push comes to shove, the group (gEDA or KiCad) which can clearly explain the benefits of their product will draw more people in. More users is one of the goals, isn't it? _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
