I think for gEDA to be adopted as a commercial product, someone must setup a company to charge people thousands of dollar for a yearly support contract so they can call anytime and talk to someone quick in order to get things resolved.
But you guys have been telling me for a 10 layer board with high speed digital signals, gEDA (or rather PCB) is not ready yet. I want to believe the other way. What are missing if I don't need the fancy via's and buried stuffs? Andy On 9/6/07, John Griessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Duncan Drennan wrote: > > > Real or not, I would reckon that there is a perceived risk in adopting > > gEDA, even though in a lot of ways the risk is reduced (future > > support, openness, etc.) The more gEDA success stories there are at a > > *commercial* level, the lower the perceived risk will be. In what > > other ways could the perceived risk be reduced? > > > I think writing tutorials well is one good way. Another is stories > about successful uses, put up on the gEDA website just like product > offerers do. > > Maybe gEDA CAN be a product. Short of the developers > attending lots of public meetings in suits, that is... :-) > > JG > > -- > Ecosensory > tinyOS devel on: ubuntu Linux; tinyOS v2.0.2; telosb ecosens1 > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user >
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
