Hi Ales, On Tuesday 11 September 2007 21:06, Ales Hvezda wrote: > > > How do you know that this pinout is correct? What other packages > > > does an lm7912 come in other than TO-220? There isn't a > > > footprint= attribute in the original symbol. My concern is > > > breaking existing user schematics.
You're right, but changing the pinnumbers without setting the footprint might cause confusion the next time someone stumbles over the pin numbers. > > You should be fairly safe with the pinouts of the LM79xx and LM78xx > > since they are older parts and the variety of power dissipation > > packages is small. There's a TO92 package out there, too. > Werner, please feel free to push this fix into the repository. Also, > thank you for setting the footprint= and symversion= attributes. The > symversion= attribute will alert any existing users that this symbol > has changed. Yes, symversion is always a good thing. Regards Werner _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
