Stuart Brorson wrote: >> We may >> just have to resign ourselves to seeing a jump as the window is first >> shown, then moved. > > In this case, the cure is worse than the disease. >
What if, you move the window, show it, then move it again (to the same position, just to be sure). On systems which get it right the first time, the second move would result in no jump at all. Cesar _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
