Hi all, FWIW, if this means that there will be a fixed order in writing objects to a file (as in the pcb file format) I'm in favor.
Let's say: - file (format) version. - global attributes (as in [author, description, comment, model-name, ...]). - all referenced (embedded) components as is and their default attributes (promote them as little as possible/necessary [pinnumber, pinseq, pinlabel, pintype, numslots, slot, author, dist-license, use-license, symversion, file?, ...]). - all references to (internal) components (see above) and their attached attributes [refdes, value, footprint, vendor, vendor_PN, ...] and other attributes required by gnetlist backends, this is the area where gattrib is useful. The referencing of symbols allows for new attributes implemented in the (near) future [scale, position/translation, rotation an mirror values of components] to satisfy popular demand regarding scaling of symbols and the updating of modified embedded symbols. - all nets. - all other/graphical=1 stuff. That sums up my EUR 0.02 I guess. Kind regards, Bert Timmerman. On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 23:19 -0400, Ales Hvezda wrote: > > Hmm, I'd better hurry up and get the "sort before write" code into libgeda, > > then. :) > > "Sort before write"? Is this going to change the order of objects as they > being written to disk? Are we really sure this is a desirable change? > Some people might be a little sensitive to such a change. > > -Ales > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > geda-user@moria.seul.org > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
