[snip] > I would very much like to move then entire existing symbols package to > gedasymbols in favour of a really minimal, lightweight symbol library to be > shipped with gEDA. The existing library can't decide what it's supposed to > be. Are the symbols supposed to be lightweight, or heavyweight? Are we > trying to include all likely devices used, or some definable subset? By > stripping back the -symbols package to a minimum, we can concentrate on > providing a good, solid basis for user's to build upon. >
Certainly. I have been waiting to do this for a few years now. However, I haven't come up with a appoach that doesn't break every single gEDA/gaf user in existance. It would be really sad if a user goes to the 'net and downloads some random *.sch files and none of the legacy components are found. -Ales _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
