Marshall Jose wrote: > I found a small mistake in the PCB pcblib-newlib/geda footprints which > can be seen here: > > http://www.gedasymbols.org/footprints/m4lib/DIN41651_20.fp and > http://www.gedasymbols.org/footprints/m4lib/DIN41651_20S.fp > > These are parts which should have 20 pins, but they somehow got > overwritten or confused with their 10-pin counterparts. I changed the > 26-pin version to create my own, correct footprints. If someone would > like to push them into the repo, I've appended them here:
Fixed. Just as a note, anything in pcblib-newlib is generated so patches need to touch the sources not the output. In this case, the patch was: Index: geda.inc =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/pcb/pcb/lib/geda.inc,v retrieving revision 1.29 diff -u -2 -r1.29 geda.inc --- geda.inc 17 Dec 2006 03:59:17 -0000 1.29 +++ geda.inc 5 Nov 2007 22:25:45 -0000 @@ -730,5 +730,5 @@ define(`PKG_DIN41651_14', `PKG_DIN41_651LAY( `$1', `$2', `$3', 14)'); define(`PKG_DIN41651_16', `PKG_DIN41_651LAY( `$1', `$2', `$3', 16)'); -define(`PKG_DIN41651_20', `PKG_DIN41_651LAY( `$1', `$2', `$3', 10)'); +define(`PKG_DIN41651_20', `PKG_DIN41_651LAY( `$1', `$2', `$3', 20)'); define(`PKG_DIN41651_26', `PKG_DIN41_651LAY( `$1', `$2', `$3', 26)'); define(`PKG_DIN41651_34', `PKG_DIN41_651LAY( `$1', `$2', `$3', 34)'); @@ -741,5 +741,5 @@ define(`PKG_DIN41651_14S', `PKG_DIN41_651STAND(`$1', `$2', `$3', 14)'); define(`PKG_DIN41651_16S', `PKG_DIN41_651STAND(`$1', `$2', `$3', 16)'); -define(`PKG_DIN41651_20S', `PKG_DIN41_651STAND(`$1', `$2', `$3', 10)'); +define(`PKG_DIN41651_20S', `PKG_DIN41_651STAND(`$1', `$2', `$3', 20)'); define(`PKG_DIN41651_26S', `PKG_DIN41_651STAND(`$1', `$2', `$3', 26)'); define(`PKG_DIN41651_34S', `PKG_DIN41_651STAND(`$1', `$2', `$3', 34)'); -Dan _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
