Steve Meier wrote: > One could argue that that is why we have guile scripts. If you have a > reasonable api access to the libgeda structures you should be able ask > complicated questions about the completness of a design.
OK, so I'll admit not having looked deeply into the capabilities of the guile api access to libgeda. Seems like good infrastructure. But guile is not a very approachable language for a rule author. A language that compiles rules into a guile script makes some sense. I think it's key that the rule language be expressive in the problem domain. -dave _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
