On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:36:01 -0800, Dave N6NZ wrote: > once upon I time I was pretty fluent with Prolog. I still have a > knee-jerk aversion to the language outside of toy problems.
I should have placed a smiley... Definition of rules shouldn't require knowledge of some kind of exotic computer language. That's why scheme scripts wouldn't do the trick for me. It is pure economy: How many schematics can I check manually while I am busy fighting with syntax problems? While the rule language should be powerful, it must be easy to grasp -- at least for the most common cases. ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak http://lilalaser.de/blog _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
