On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:03:01 -0500, al davis wrote: > It has lots of features for advanced use, but doesn't work well as a > simple waveform viewer.
Did you use xmgrace ability to receive commands and actions via pipes? > For that, I still think gwave is the best so > far. Gwave is simple, but has some build issues. Well, the features Dan asked for (arbitrary functions, polar chart, smith chart, Millions of data points, etc), are clearly advanced. These would be a serious project to code from scratch. Don't underestimate the value of publication quality postscript output. ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211 Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
