Part of the reason I ask this is that as I complete my work on a new library, netlister et al. I am thinking that beyond having a hierarchical schematic I would like to have symbols that can have files such as verilog, vhdl spice etc includded and that if the netleister could translate a schematic into say verilog and then include embeded verilof code it would feed streight into a verilof simulator. So this implies a desire/need for symbols which are used only for simulation such as signal generators and measurement nodes.
Steve Meier Steve Meier wrote: > I am becomming more and more a proponent of heavy symbols or even a data > base then can generate heavy symbols. One of the really nice things > about geda is its tollerent or flexible and that heavy symbols could > easily be implemented. So the question is... is there enough support in > the geda community to create a heavy symbol library? > > Steve Meier > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > > _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
