DJ Delorie wrote: >> I'm not advocating making a relational database part of the required >> geda tool set > > No reason it couldn't be, either. We can hide all that in gattrib and > the netlisters. > > No reason not to support multiple BOM files in gattrib either; just > like we support multiple SCH files already. >
Sounds like a really good partitioning of functions to me. John G -- Ecosensory _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
