Hi All, I also think Database approach is the right idea. Most commercial EDA tools use that approach. I hope we can try to make the gEDA DB interface as generic as possible, so that it can accommodate VLSI design cell librarie as well as PCB component libs.
Best Regards, Paul Tan -----Original Message----- From: Steve Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: gEDA user mailing list <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 3:59 pm Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Parts DB API On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 23:22 +0000, Levente wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > The symbol files should be as light as possible, and we should make them heavy > by adding information coming from the database. > So can we make a list of what should come from the light symbol and what should be injected by the database? Steve Meier _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user ________________________________________________________________________ More new features than ever. Check out the new AIM(R) Mail ! - http://webmail.aim.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
