Hi Steve, Thanks for all the informations you provided. Its been really helpful and when I get time, I will search for more info on those gEDA topics.
As you all probably know, I am of the opinion that gEDA/gaf is in a very good stable foundation, to be able to allow us to implement some (for now), in the future, most, if not all, the features that a commercial EDA tool vendor has to offer. I would like to see that a fully Hierarchical Parameterized Design features set be implemented in gEDA, comparable to some of the commercial advance VLSI design tools. Thanks again. Best Regards, Paul Tan -----Original Message----- From: Steve Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: gEDA user mailing list <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:31 pm Subject: Re: gEDA-user: gnetlist l and m options Paul, The code Peter is refering to is quite stale by now. It has been my intention to finish of a few more tasks and then make my latest code available. These tasks include the completion of making the netlister a schem script engine (hence my questions about the l and m command line options), Move the writting of schematic files and symbols from the c code to schem scripts (the reading of schematics and symbols is completed), Publishing a more or less complete scheme interface for the library, complete midlevel and backend scripts for supporting hierarchical verilog, vhdl and spice. As I mentioned earlier, I am happy to let others do what they wish with this body of work. It is geda based (thus gpl) without a doubt it carries geda dna deeply. While I grumble about the state of geda code the reality is that the geda developers have captured within their code/data structures many important EDA concepts. If you really wish to see the latest (stale) published version I would be happy to give you a link. If you have a little patience I expect to be releasing a much more interesting version soon. If you are sharp at scheme I am very interested in talking to you about the scheme interface and the flow of the scheme script engine that the netlister is becoming. Thanks, Steve Meier Peter Clifton wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 02:06 -0500, Paul Tan wrote: > >> Hi Steve, >> >> My responses are never meant to be political, >> I am sorry if they went across to you that way. >> >> There is nothing political about asking if the >> codes change would be disclosed to other gEDA >> developers. Is that too much to ask for? >> > > If you search the mailing list archives, you will see various times > Steve has posted links to his code. I can't recall the URL off hand, but > it shouldn't be too hard to find. > > Best wishes, > > _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user ________________________________________________________________________ More new features than ever. Check out the new AIM(R) Mail ! - http://webmail.aim.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
