On Feb 7, 2008 11:47 PM, Peter Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps I just listed another argument for recombining the suite? > > BTW.. It is entirely possible for debian packages (probably RPMs too), > to build the "n" binary packages (about 8,9 or so now), from a single > source tarball... just something worth considering?
FWIW I've started doing this, as I probably have the worst itch (my PC is a Pentium 2) when it's time to run autoreconf and ./configure. One trouble is that the applications do: #include <libgeda/libgeda.h> but building from toplevel, it would mean rearranging the source tree so that libgeda.h and friends from the *source* tree (not the installed location) are visible at compile-time. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
