On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:14:58 -0400, Karl Edler wrote: > This is just a vague wish but wouldn't it be nice to have places for > checked symbols and footprints?
Methinks, gedasymbols.org is a good start. With a few additional features and a bunch of user contribution it may develop into the kind of resource you envisage: Imagine, users were allowed to "sign" specific symbols of other authors as "tested". This would introduce some kind of peer review. On a different track, there might be several sets of design rules on the site. Users would mark symbols or footprints as conforming with a specific rule set. ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak http://lilalaser.de/blog _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
