On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Robert Riemer wrote: > David Griffith wrote: > > I mention this because some of you probably have gizmos to detect noxious > > stuff in the air (like rosin, lead, etc) > > > > New York City is debating a law that would require a permit to own devices > > capable of detecting biological, chemical, and nuclear agents. Want to > > see if there's mold in the air? Want to check the air pollution level? > > Do you have a geiger counter for some reason? You'll need a permit for > > such things. This is sloppy, useless, and counter productive. > > > > http://www.gothamgazette.com/blogs/wonkster/2008/04/28/ > > detector-permits-debated-tomorrow/ > > > Would this also include ionizing smoke detectors?
Yes, but they've recently added language to allow smoke, radon, and CO detectors, but it still has legions of holes. For instance, what's a geiger counter for personal use? A common CDV700? Those were made for the old fallout shelters. What about a military model? Are those legal? Nobody knows. -- David Griffith [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
