I'm comfortable with compiling from source, and not worried about branches too much. Having said that, though, I think the solution presented by Peter and Kai-Martin is simple enough.
thanks all gene Bernd Jendrissek wrote: > How comfrotable are you with compiling source from experimental > branches? I have a branch that would make this easy: place a generic > NPN symbol and a generic PNP symbol, then assign the two to a > component that knows that it needs both. You only need a > part-specific symbol for the component which you can keep on a > separate sheet (it's graphically uninteresting - it contains only the > function->pinnumber mapping and would have no connections of its own > in this case). > > Otherwise just follow Kai-Martin's advice. You'll have to create > part-specific NPN and PNP symbols though, to get the right pinnumbers. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
