> gEDA is a collection of independent programs, which shall be forced > towork together by some scripts.
I can understand that impression. > Some more scripts have as result, thatsome experts know some other > experts which shall have heard about peoplewho have routed the pcb > from the tutorial. :-) > KiCAD is a collection of bugs pretending an attractive program which > can be used with the mouse. :-) > Geda is absolutely nothing for me, I like only > complete/integratedsolutions. There's going to be people like that, we can't help them. > The biggest problem is, that gschem and pcb are separateprograms > which are coupled with the script gsch2pcb. We're working on this one. > gschem and pcb havedifferent user interfaces, which you have to > learn. Yup. > gEDA: Installation is terrible. Configuration is terrible (designed > bysome cranks who think configuration files in LISP are fine.) :-) > pcb doeshurt. Stiff like bubble gum (written in > Tcl/TK). This is the "pcb 3.0" fork that was rewritten in TCL. It is *not* our version of pcb. > Handling of symbols and footprint is a pain. Yup. > Collected scrap, at gedasymbols too. It can seem that way. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
