On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:13 PM, al davis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sunday 08 February 2009, Christoph Lechner wrote: >> > How can it know? >> >> Well, I thought: maybe there's some attribute dedicated to >> this case ... > > The Spice netlister is loaded with special cases, because the > Spice syntax is loaded with special cases. > >> >> > I recommend that you add the X on the schematic. Doesn't >> > the netlister just pass the label through? >> >> Not really. If I call the diode XD108, the netlister calls it >> DXD108. > > *&%^(*^Z^^^(^%((% > > Like I say .... "This is one of the reasons that those in the > know are pressuring for a shift away from the Spice format." > >> Wouldn't it be a work-around to call the diode U108? I'll try >> that. > > No. Then you will get DU108.
How about a plugin for gschem. It user would flag parts on a schematic as using subcircuits. There should be a script to go threw and slap an X before the refdes name or remove them at will? > > On Sunday 08 February 2009, al davis wrote: >>> I have >>> been thinking of changing it to ignore the letter when the >>> model name gives enough information to determine the type. > > That does it .. I guess the only sane thing to do is to make > the change. It really makes it easier to ignore the letter, > considering plugin conflicts. > > It is really worse than it looks on the surface. > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > -- http://www.coe.neu.edu/~efoss/ http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
