al davis wrote: > The Gnucap behavior is consistent with Hspice and Spectre. At > least that is what I have been told. I don't have access to > them to check it out. > > The behavior is an artifact of the implementation. In > Gnucap, "m" works for all devices, including plugin models and > subcircuits, even when the models as supplied do not explicitly > implement it. > I hope you haven't implemented the ngspice brain damage that causes it to apply the m= multiplier repeatedly for each successive "analysis" (your transistors grow as you proceed).
I think I'd be using gnucap if it could do noise analysis. But I have a hacked up ngspice/spicepp combination that works with TSMC parameter sets, making it hard to change for just part of job. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace Limited _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
